|
|
|
| Motorcycle Message Board - Motorcycle USA > MotorcycleUSA.com! > Bike Reviews > 2005 Honda CBR600RR - First Ride | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  Dinoski Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2004 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 12/3/2004 4:39 PM (GMT -8) |   | | This year should produce an interesting 600cc shootout. But why a 650cc bike from Triumph? The pricing will be playing a big factor also. Honda had always produced bikes that don't win on shootouts but win on the racetracks - which means they are highly modified when it comes to racing. They should put all machines in one race - just like the 80s - and let the motorcycle gods sort them out. But the price it getting up there. I think Honda should do the following on the 2004-600cc machine - remove the underseat exhaust and replace it with a much lighter conventional one - to save weight. Modify the swingarm to accomodate the conventional exhaust - to save weight. Modify intake to solve power delivery problem. Change the color of the bike and graphics - sell it as a 2005 machine at $1000 less! | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Dinoski Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2004 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 12/4/2004 6:29 AM (GMT -8) |   | Jaime:
I agree with you but u don't see my point - The problems with the 2004 600 Honda according to the article are the following: 1. Too heavy 2. Power delivery problem 3. High price
I was merely suggesting the solutions to the problem of the bike to improve its performance and maybe Honda will sell more. - Make sense to you? U want me to make it more clearer?
Remove the heavy underseat exhaust and replace it with a conventional one to reduce weight. Which will require a lighter less bulky swingarm - less weight Bigger throttle bodies to improve and solve power delivery performance. Use the same engine as last year - save money.
OH YEAH!, YAMAHA ALREADY DID THAT! AND ALL THEIR 600 SOLD OUT - HOW'S THAT FOR THE ECONOMY! Simple econmics to me. Who's fault is it the dollar crashed anyways? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  chris_on_bike Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2004 Total Posts : 4 | Posted 12/4/2004 1:44 PM (GMT -8) |   | i would take the cbr600rr if its costs $7999. lets put it this way: the world of japanese 600s price is rising, the honda from $8599 in '04 to $8799 in '05, the kawasaki was updated but the price rose to $8599 from $7999, the suzuki from $8099 to $8199, the yamaha from $8199 to $8399. on the other hand, the brit, Triumph's Daytona 600 grew into a 650, the price? the same, $7999. so all in all the triumph is more worth it in my opinion... but not tht i mean the japanese r lousy. they r very cool machines, really, but the prices aren't cool. someone must tell the japanese 4 to pull down the prices.... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Jaime Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 33 | Posted 12/4/2004 4:51 PM (GMT -8) |   | Dinoski:
I get your point, 10-4 on your performance suggestions. I WAS making a point on the pricing differential suggested- $1,000.
Who's fault is the Dollar crashing? - all of us in the USA. Massive trade deficits - importing $700 billion worth of goods OVER what we exported this year, and budgetary deficits, close to $500 billion this fiscal year. To top it off, an unhealthy $8 trillion in debt to foreign countries...and counting! Estimated National internal debt close to $40 trillion, but who's counting?
Partial solution: buy Buells instead of Jap sport bikes! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Dinoski Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2004 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 12/4/2004 6:51 PM (GMT -8) |   | Jaime: -$1000 was a suggestion to lower the prices of the bikes - so everyone can enjoy riding a high perfomance bike at an affordable price. Are we in a motorcycle forum or a political forum? Pls read and refer to the article. Get the . ? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Jaime Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 33 | Posted 12/4/2004 7:42 PM (GMT -8) |   | Dinoski:
Yes, yes and no. It's not a political forum but trade aspects play into the price equation, AND since someone asked whose fault it was that the dollar was... couldn't help to POINT IT OUT! My apologies if I went overboard, I just like economics (make no mistake, I like bikes much more!)
No further arguments, you are correct in wishing the prices could be made lower, I do too. I'm bikeless right now, but that 2005 Buell XB9SX is looking mighty good. Been riding since I was 13 years old back in 1970.
Cheers to all fellow bikers,
Jaime | | Back to Top | | |
 |  chris_on_bike Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2004 Total Posts : 4 | Posted 12/6/2004 10:01 PM (GMT -8) |   | honda is obviously making us paying more 4 less. the kawasaki is the best value in the 600 class, in my opinion. im eyeing on 1, n it was so damn cool. | | Back to Top | | |
      |  BiffStroganoffsky Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2004 Total Posts : 3 | Posted 12/30/2004 12:52 PM (GMT -8) |   | Howdy! I'm a newbie here but I just have a quick general question.
I noticed in the article that the bike showed up on your scale at some 410lbs. but is 'advertised' in the Honda brochure at a svelte 367lbs dry. Is it always the case that a 'delivered' bike always adds on that much weight? Does the coolant and oil really weigh that much or is it that 'dry' weight doesn't include other 'accessories' like the toolkit, manual, etc?
Thanks. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Kevin Duke Rubber-side Down

       Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 1521 | Posted 1/1/2005 12:36 PM (GMT -8) |   | |
Always thinking, aren't you DataDan? Interesting theory using the bike's GVWR and max capacity to calculate the weight of a bike; that's a new one to me. I'll keep that in mind and check it out further in the future. The "add 60 pounds" to a manufacturer's stated dry weight is a fair bit less precise.
FYI, we weigh virtually every bike we test on our electronic Intercomp scales, the standard in the car and motorcycle industry. To make comparing weights as effective as possible, we subtract the weight of a full tank of gas to arrive at our published weights; full-tank weights are less comparable, as they punish bikes with larger tanks which we definitely don't want to do.
BTW, if you want to know exactly how much Triumph's Rocket 3 weighs, you won't have to wait much longer. We're putting together our Bruiser Cruiser showdown in which the Triumph, Kawasaki Vulcan 2000 and Honda Rune will go head to head against the backdrop of Arizona's backroads and city streets. In additon to accurate weights, we'll also be recording performance data on our Vbox to find out which bike inflicts the biggest bruises on the pavement. We're looking forward to this one.
-KD, MCUSA Road Test Editor | | Back to Top | | |
 |  BiffStroganoffsky Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2004 Total Posts : 3 | Posted 1/3/2005 9:21 AM (GMT -8) |   | | Hmm, just like the power ratings of amps and and speakers: real -vs- mean and/or max. It's a 'good thing (tm)' you guys do your own verification for us consumers who don't have bathroom scales that go beyond 212lbs. :) | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:42 AM (GMT -8) There are a total of 447,406 posts in 35,241 threads. In the last 3 days there were 13 new threads and 230 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 17572 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, hotlunch. 1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2 dotNetBB © 2000-2009 All content found on motorcycle-usa.com is copyrighted by MotorcycleUSA.com, INC. |
|
|