|
|
|
| Motorcycle Message Board - Motorcycle USA > MotorcycleUSA.com! > Bike Reviews > 2005 CRF250X vs WR250F | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  bkorfhage Punk Kid

       Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 410 | Posted 4/18/2005 7:42 AM (GMT -8) |   | | | |
 |  Reg Registered Member
        Date Joined Jan 2005 Total Posts : 277 | Posted 4/18/2005 9:04 AM (GMT -8) |   | | Great comparison. Sounds like it would be hard to go wrong with either bike. Keep these kind of comparison tests coming! | | Back to Top | | |
  |  OhioSteve Registered Member

       Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 861 | Posted 4/18/2005 4:56 PM (GMT -8) |   | Do they pay you to do this? I mean, truly speaking, do they pay you to do this? After reading that, I'd like one of each! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  wrooster Registered Member
        Date Joined Apr 2005 Total Posts : 3 | Posted 4/21/2005 6:15 PM (GMT -8) |   | which of the "free" mods were done to the WR250F prior to your testing?
thanks jim aka the wrooster '01 wr250f | | Back to Top | | |
    |  wrooster Registered Member
        Date Joined Apr 2005 Total Posts : 3 | Posted 4/27/2005 12:46 PM (GMT -8) |   | brian, thanks for the reply. i'm trying to reconcile the power and torque curves with what modifications were made to your test wr250f... that said, could you detail exactly what you did to uncork the bike?
thanks jim aka the wrooster '01 wr250f | | Back to Top | | |
 |  spoonjr Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2005 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 5/14/2005 6:57 PM (GMT -8) |   | | I dont know what the Yamaha has for power, but on Mothers day, I was blessed with getting to ride the Honda X. I am not a small rider, six foot, 230lbs, and the bike pulled me all over the place. I even tackled a couple of large uphills, with no problems. The bike was amazing, to the point that I got got a bit comfortable, and cocky on the thing, and ended up heading over the bars. Good thing I landed where I did, it gave the bike a nice soft spot to land on. Still have not made up my mind on which bike to get, as Yamaha was my ride for years. The Honda ways heavy on my mind after getting to ride it. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Jaime Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 33 | Posted 5/16/2005 7:15 PM (GMT -8) |   | |
Brian:
Wrooster has a very valid question, but only asked half the question. Both bikes tested, if California(n) versions, are choked-down.
From what I know, the "California" CRF250X has a more restrictive airbox, muffler and an all together different cam than the other 49-state X's. In fact, this cam is milder than the "regular" one, which is milder than the one on the R bike.
So, the question still stands - what was done to both bikes (if anything) to get the dyno readings? Demanding readers want to know...
BTW - EXCELLENT shoot-out!!! MCUSA out shoots the print mags with much more detailed writing!
Cheers,
Jaime
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Jaime Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 33 | Posted 5/16/2005 7:17 PM (GMT -8) |   | OOOPS, clicked the wrong icon - should had been "THUMBS UP"!
Jaime | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Jaime Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 33 | Posted 5/17/2005 7:58 PM (GMT -8) |   | Brian:
Thanks for the answer! That clears the air, there is easy extra power to find on the X with a few $$$.
Jaime | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Dan02 Registered Member
        Date Joined Nov 2005 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 11/19/2005 5:23 PM (GMT -8) |   | | How does the CRF250X do in sand? Just curious, thanks... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  MajikMD Registered Member
        Date Joined Aug 2006 Total Posts : 4 | Posted 8/20/2006 7:30 PM (GMT -8) |   | Just wondering 2 quck questions....maybe someone will know the answer:
1. Are the models in the comparison California-emissions models, or the othe 49-state models?
2. Was the well-known issue with the restriction exhaust baffle, restrictive airbox, and the partial throttle-stop on the Yamaha WR corrected for the test? (most people I have spoken with remove the exhaust baffle, open the airbox, and remove the throttle stop pin from the carb) fom what I've been told, the WR is a totally different bike power-wise with these 5 minute mods corrected.
Thanks in advance! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  MajikMD Registered Member
        Date Joined Aug 2006 Total Posts : 4 | Posted 8/20/2006 7:32 PM (GMT -8) |   | Woops...I missed the discussion about the exhaust baffle removed above. What about the throttle-stop in the WR? I've personally seen one and the stop blocks about 1/3 of the throttle!! Just wondering...
Thanks. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  luke9 Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 2007 Total Posts : 5 | Posted 6/13/2007 12:07 PM (GMT -8) |   | | i think we need to see the 250x and the wr250 in 08. the wr has been seriously changed since 05, and the honda has had lots of refinement. how about another shootout? also i think seeing the ktm xcf-w 250, the suzuki dr-z 250, and the kawasaki klx300r along woth the crf250x, and wr250 would give it some spice... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  DR-ZKing Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 199 | Posted 6/13/2007 2:21 PM (GMT -8) |   | | I like your idea luke9, they should do all of the small-bore offraod bikes, not just the new enduro ones. Of course with the dyno numbers and suspension, the DR-Z250 and KLX300R would stand no chance, but they have a few qualities that can make them stand there own. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  luke9 Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 2007 Total Posts : 5 | Posted 6/16/2007 12:17 PM (GMT -8) |   | well, you never kno, suzuki might unveil a brand new DR-Z250 for 08, but i kinda doubt it. its a shame that they havent tried to keep up w/ the others and start a competitive offroad lineup. they have soo mutch potential in thier twin spar frames, i mean, just adding that would make the dr-z a whole new bike. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  DR-ZKing Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 199 | Posted 6/18/2007 3:54 PM (GMT -8) |   | | Giving the DRZ liquid cooling, a hotter compression ratio, and an inverted fork would be the best way to go in my opinion. I don't like the offroad bikes that have been converted from MX'rs, because they just don't have the bullet proof design that the original endero bikes have. In my opinion, Suzuki would be smart to just make the DRZ better, and not use a whole new bike. | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:27 AM (GMT -8) There are a total of 447,406 posts in 35,241 threads. In the last 3 days there were 13 new threads and 230 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 17572 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, hotlunch. 1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2 dotNetBB © 2000-2009 All content found on motorcycle-usa.com is copyrighted by MotorcycleUSA.com, INC. |
|
|