Motorcycle USA Forums : Join the Revolution
  HomeLog InRegisterCommunity CalendarSearch the ForumHelp
   
Motorcycle Message Board - Motorcycle USA > MotorcycleUSA.com! > Bike Reviews > 2007 Harley-Davidson XL 883 Sportster  Forum Quick Jump
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum. Post Reply Printable Version
26 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Harley1
Forum Moderator



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Harley1AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Dec 2006
Total Posts : 247
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 8:29 AM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

The Sportster turns 50 in 2007, making it the longest continuously produced motorcycle in the Harley-Davidson contingency. We shared some fond memories related to the anchor of the Harley line while reviewing the 2007 Harley-Davidson XL 883 Sportster. We'd like to hear your take on the article here in the MCUSA Forum.

Back to Top
 

marco427
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to marco427AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2007
Total Posts : 2
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 10:35 AM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Better recheck your metric/US conversion chart as well as Harley's promo lit on the Sportster. 883 cc is, and always has been around 55 cubic inches, not 96.
Back to Top
 

Casper
The teddy bear of doom,,,



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to CasperAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Sep 2006
Total Posts : 2635
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 12:16 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
883cc = 53.88 in-cu


This is my Motorcycle,,,
           There are many like it, but this one is mine,,,

Back to Top
 

Harley1
Forum Moderator



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Harley1AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Dec 2006
Total Posts : 247
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 12:32 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks guys. With four 883 models, four 1200 models, and an anniversary edition, all the different specs I've been analyzing have become a blur. But thanks to your astuteness, we dropped it back to where it belongs. Much appreciated, amigos.
Back to Top
 

VSTROMNICK
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to VSTROMNICKAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2006
Total Posts : 2
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 1:56 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

i have tried on several sportsters at dealers and when i set my 200 lbs on the bike the front forks lose 2/3 of

their travel to about 1 inch left.  i love their paint jobs.  i once rode a 1100 sportster a short distance and liked its engine, it had about 20,000 on the clock.

Back to Top
 

OhioSteve
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to OhioSteveAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 861
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 5:53 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I like the sportster and the vulcan 900 in this price bracket.


I am the foremost expert on my opinion.

Back to Top
 

Cap'n
Shiny Side Up



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Cap'nAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2006
Total Posts : 1064
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 6:01 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Good looking blue, and good write-up. Makes me realize that the old "Harleys get a 30% price markup" line doesn't necessarily apply to the sportster.

I wonder if Johnny noticed the observed mpg, though? Seems like he was able to get mid 50's out of his. Perhaps this demo model wasn't broken in? I'm curious - 10mpg is a decent-size discrepancy.


82 Suzi GS300L
02 Kawi Vulcan 500
07 Yam FZ6
4 Yrs, 19,000 miles
"The first thing to learn about street riding is not to start on an R6." -Luke

Back to Top
 

HogWild
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to HogWildAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2006
Total Posts : 5123
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 8:08 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Having been the proud owner of 3 Sporties I would have to say this write-up isn't bad at all.... The new Sporty has some advantages to the Sporty of 2004-2006 in that the fuel injection virtually eliminated carb farts and the cold blooded nature of the beast. I don't know how much the rider who tested the bike weighed but if that rider was anywhere near 200 pounds that suspension needed to be adjusted as the stock bike is hard pressed to handle the recommended 185 pound rider. In regards to the fuel mileage I must say these findings would appear to go along with the experiences I have found with other 07 Sporty owners I have talked to. The new machines both 883 and 1200 don't seem to be able to pull the fuel mileage of the carbed models... Another issue that comes to mind is the low fuel light which seems to come on before the tank is actually low. In all, the Sporty is simply a fun bike to ride. It has been my experience with the 2004 1200R that when the bike is suspension dialed, geared properly and set up for the road with the larger tank and a stage 1 you can have an absolute blast with a bike that still gets over 50mpg on a regular basis and this would include 2-up riding. It's not a muscle bike, just a great piece of American iron that is still sold for a decent price when you consider what is being offered.... Now, if I could only get my hands on a new N model....

As to the 50th anniversary model, what a joke.... If this is the best Harley can do for the bike's 50th year then things at the MoCo have really fallen down. The additional price simply isn't worth it. It sure has some fancy badging though.....
Back to Top
 

Wildfire
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to WildfireAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Mar 2007
Total Posts : 4
 
   Posted 6/11/2007 8:36 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

I have had both extremes and a few in between.  My first sportster was the original 1957.  I currently have a 2006 custom and I love it,  Through the years I had a 74 and 75, both were great machines.

The "57" I bought off the used machine row in Wilsons Harley Davidson in Cedar Rapids Iowa in 1965 for $545.00.  I had owned a 53 Triumph prior and the Sportster was a new beginning.  All my friends from Deep River Ia rode Triumphs or BSA.  The Harley Hog laughter immediately sounded until we took them off the line and my 57 Sportster wiped off more smiles than any marine corp drill sergeant could have wiped off.  My 57 sportster was a wonderful machine, when someone needed to go two up it was always my sportster who took the added load.  When my buddies' english bikes began to leak oil and shake apart the sportster with two up never leaked a drop except for the chain oiler. 

My 57 was well known throughout Iowa, Keokuk and poweshiek counties as a wonderful machine.  There were no oil leaks and vibration was fractional compared to the english bikes. The straight pipes had the rumble that caused many people to step out on their porch for an ear full and I could get the town cop out of bed any hour of the night.  The one problem was the generator and I think I put three of them on in the twenty five years I owned the 57.

I am amazed at the retorick which suggests that the clutch pulled too hard.  My dad had a 57- 74"  and the clutch was rather challenging.  I never considered the sportster as having a clutch that was too tough. I think this difficult pull is some girly-guy trying to create something that really isn't. I prefer to imagine it is those girly-men trying to set the standard with their girly-bikes.

The 57 sportster never left me on the side of the road.  Both my sons rode the 57 to high school,  I regret that I sold the 57 in 1989 to a museum in Wisc.  I didn't think about it at the time, but I sold a piece of me and one of my best friends.  Today I'm 63 yrs old but if I could get on my old 57, I'd go straight to Deep River, Ia and wake the town cop up as I rode through his yard.

As I said, today I ride a 06 883 custom and I love it.  My history includes a 37 Indian, 47 Indian, 53 Triumph, 57 Harley 74, 57 Sportster, 65 Electra glide, 74 Sportster, 75 Sportster, 79 Gold Wing.  Nothing had the guts, balls, stamina, charisma, or sound that belonged to my 57 Sportster.  It was the John Wayne of motorcycles. 

Long live the Sportster,

Wildfire

Back to Top
 

jboland
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to jbolandAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2007
Total Posts : 90
 
   Posted 6/13/2007 3:13 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Great write up. Glad to see the new Sportsters getting some good press. And the 883, no less. I don't know if there's any difference between the front springs in the 06 vs. the 07, but the suspension on my 06 883C handles my 240 lbs just fine. However, I am planning to upgrade to Progessive springs and maybe a heavier fork oil for a better ride. That's one of the great things about Sporty's, and Harley's in general - they are so easy to customize to your needs and wants. The aftermarket is endless. And not just chrome bits either. Heck, there's even aftermarket hardtail frames out there for 04-06 Sportsters if that's your thing.

For the 50th anniversary, I was really hoping the MoCo would do up the 50th anniversary model as a really cool retro based either on the original '57 or an early 60's XLCH. In that regard, I was rather disappointed with the actual 50th anniversary special edition. But they more than made up for it with the introduction of the Nightster. The Sporty's having a very good year indeed!
Back to Top
 

Tros
Global Moderator



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to TrosAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 7309
 
   Posted 6/13/2007 4:52 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have been working some serious overtime, but last night I started to read the article. Hopefully I will finish it up tonight, but so far, I like what I've read. The Sportster 883 --- and Sportsters, in general, are very solid motorcycles. I would almost go as far to say that it's one of Harley's best product.


"People take different roads seeking fulfillment and happiness. Just because they're not on your road doesn't mean they've gotten lost."

Back to Top
 

HockeyFan
XL883C / 9433 miles



Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit HockeyFan's website.Send a Private Message to HockeyFanAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined May 2007
Total Posts : 195
 
   Posted 6/13/2007 4:57 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
burger Tros said...
I have been working some serious overtime, but last night I started to read the article. Hopefully I will finish it up tonight, but so far, I like what I've read. The Sportster 883 --- and Sportsters, in general, are very solid motorcycles. I would almost go as far to say that it's one of Harley's best product.

I was JUST looking at one tonight at 6pm.  883-custom.  It's a nice bike, forward pegs (good for my height).  I got the feeling that the turning radius wasn't quite the same as the Zuk M50 I've been trying out (see my M50 vs. Sporty thread).  With that said though, EFI and belt driven should make for a very reliable m/c.  Now I'll read the rest of the thread above.  burger


Be smart - take a local MSF course before doing anything else.

Back to Top
 

HockeyFan
XL883C / 9433 miles



Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit HockeyFan's website.Send a Private Message to HockeyFanAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined May 2007
Total Posts : 195
 
   Posted 6/13/2007 4:58 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
VSTROMNICK said...

i have tried on several sportsters at dealers and when i set my 200 lbs on the bike the front forks lose 2/3 of

their travel to about 1 inch left.  i love their paint jobs.  i once rode a 1100 sportster a short distance and liked its engine, it had about 20,000 on the clock.

What?  I weigh 214 and noticed barely any movement on the forks.  Better have someone look at it more closely.nono


Be smart - take a local MSF course before doing anything else.

Back to Top
 

HogWild
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to HogWildAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2006
Total Posts : 5123
 
   Posted 6/13/2007 7:05 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
HockeyFan said...
VSTROMNICK said...


i have tried on several sportsters at dealers and when i set my 200 lbs on the bike the front forks lose 2/3 of

their travel to about 1 inch left. i love their paint jobs. i once rode a 1100 sportster a short distance and liked its engine, it had about 20,000 on the clock.


What? I weigh 214 and noticed barely any movement on the forks. Better have someone look at it more closely. nono


I have a feeling we may be talking about the L and C models here. Granted, they will sag a bit with the stock suspension settings but 2/3 of the overall travel is reachinging I think.....
Back to Top
 

Tros
Global Moderator



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to TrosAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 7309
 
   Posted 6/14/2007 8:54 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
HockeyFan said...
With that said though, EFI and belt driven should make for a very reliable m/c.  Now I'll read the rest of the thread above.  burger

EFI, belt-driven, hydrolic valves... It's got alot of "just hop on and ride" to it. :-)


"People take different roads seeking fulfillment and happiness. Just because they're not on your road doesn't mean they've gotten lost."

Back to Top
 

jboland
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to jbolandAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2007
Total Posts : 90
 
   Posted 6/14/2007 11:58 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tros said...
HockeyFan said...
With that said though, EFI and belt driven should make for a very reliable m/c.  Now I'll read the rest of the thread above.  burger

EFI, belt-driven, hydrolic valves... It's got alot of "just hop on and ride" to it. :-)

Amen!  Considering you can check (and change) the oil on the sidestand, these are just about the easiest bikes to maintain you can get.
Back to Top
 

TechMaven
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to TechMavenAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2006
Total Posts : 4
 
   Posted 6/15/2007 2:44 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I was a little surprised at the statement of the Suzuki Blvd and Kaw Vulcan being 4 strokes. Did anyone not know this already?


undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedI live for internal combustion!undefined

Back to Top
 

saabdon
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to saabdonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2007
Total Posts : 1
 
   Posted 7/12/2007 2:51 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I just purchased a 07 883 3 weeks ago. My first Harley. I love this bike. My Fuel Economy is unreal. I get about 50 in town and my best on the freeway so far has been 69 MPG @ 70. I have installed Rush Pipes so I could hear the Great
Harley sound.
I have found this bike to be a Great Handling Machine. Much better than some of the Japanese Rides I have owned. I don't have a bad thing to say about this Machine. I would recommend it to any of my friends looking for a Midsize
Cruiser.
I will most likely upgrade to the 1200 Kit after the warrenty is up, But for now this is a Great Bike. Sorry it took me so long to look at Harley.
By the Way, If you take off the Stuffy Stock Mufflers you Gain much in Torque. I kinda think the Fuel Economy will also go up if I'm easy on the throttle.

saabdon
Back to Top
 

HockeyFan
XL883C / 9433 miles



Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit HockeyFan's website.Send a Private Message to HockeyFanAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined May 2007
Total Posts : 195
 
   Posted 7/12/2007 6:30 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
saabdon said...
I just purchased a 07 883 3 weeks ago. My first Harley. I love this bike. My Fuel Economy is unreal. I get about 50 in town and my best on the freeway so far has been 69 MPG @ 70. I have installed Rush Pipes so I could hear the Great
Harley sound.
I have found this bike to be a Great Handling Machine. Much better than some of the Japanese Rides I have owned. I don't have a bad thing to say about this Machine. I would recommend it to any of my friends looking for a Midsize
Cruiser.
I will most likely upgrade to the 1200 Kit after the warrenty is up, But for now this is a Great Bike. Sorry it took me so long to look at Harley.
By the Way, If you take off the Stuffy Stock Mufflers you Gain much in Torque. I kinda think the Fuel Economy will also go up if I'm easy on the throttle.

saabdon
I bought this same m/c 3 weeks ago also.  Have 700 miles on it and I was away for a week.  I had the shocks adjusted from the 1st to 4th position and and I put a mid-low sissy bar on it.  I was going to do pipes but wanted some luggage functionality.  Good luck with it!


_________________________________________________________________________
 
'07 Harley Sportster 883 Custom
 
Be smart - take a local MSF course before doing anything else.

Back to Top
 

brianfromdetroit
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to brianfromdetroitAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableClick to Add plasticcookies2000 to Your Y! Friends List.MSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2007
Total Posts : 112
 
   Posted 7/12/2007 6:39 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
saabdon said...
I just purchased a 07 883 3 weeks ago. My first Harley. I love this bike. My Fuel Economy is unreal. I get about 50 in town and my best on the freeway so far has been 69 MPG @ 70. I have installed Rush Pipes so I could hear the Great
Harley sound.
I have found this bike to be a Great Handling Machine. Much better than some of the Japanese Rides I have owned. I don't have a bad thing to say about this Machine. I would recommend it to any of my friends looking for a Midsize
Cruiser.
I will most likely upgrade to the 1200 Kit after the warrenty is up, But for now this is a Great Bike. Sorry it took me so long to look at Harley.
By the Way, If you take off the Stuffy Stock Mufflers you Gain much in Torque. I kinda think the Fuel Economy will also go up if I'm easy on the throttle.

saabdon


My 883 with stage one will be here in 2 weeks. Cant wait!


Harley Davidson Sportster 883 Stage 1 Vance and Hines

Back to Top
 

HogWild
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to HogWildAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2006
Total Posts : 5123
 
   Posted 7/12/2007 7:08 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
saabdon said...
I just purchased a 07 883 3 weeks ago. My first Harley. I love this bike. My Fuel Economy is unreal. I get about 50 in town and my best on the freeway so far has been 69 MPG @ 70. I have installed Rush Pipes so I could hear the Great
Harley sound.
I have found this bike to be a Great Handling Machine. Much better than some of the Japanese Rides I have owned. I don't have a bad thing to say about this Machine. I would recommend it to any of my friends looking for a Midsize
Cruiser.
I will most likely upgrade to the 1200 Kit after the warrenty is up, But for now this is a Great Bike. Sorry it took me so long to look at Harley.
By the Way, If you take off the Stuffy Stock Mufflers you Gain much in Torque. I kinda think the Fuel Economy will also go up if I'm easy on the throttle.

saabdon


The Sporty speedo and ODO are typically off. The speedo is generally happy by 5-6mph and the ODO will read 105-107 at 100 actual miles. Recalibrating your high of 69mpg brings it down to a very realistic 64-65 and this is not abnormal at all. Your speed at 70 is probably closer to 64-65mph. Holding to 65 a few weeks back I pulled just over 61 out of my stage 1 1200..... The Sporty does very well on fuel and with the 4.5 gallon tank I can breach 200 miles on mine.........

Post Edited (HogWild) : 7/13/2007 3:59:45 AM GMT

Back to Top
 

jboland
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to jbolandAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2007
Total Posts : 90
 
   Posted 7/12/2007 9:30 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Considering that the Sportster gets such great fuel mileage (and Big Twins aren't that bad either), why is everyone so concerned that the enviro-nazis are going to force the MoCo to go over completely to liquid cooling? Isn't fuel efficiency the number 1 beef with the tree huggers?
Back to Top
 

EdbearNZ
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to EdbearNZAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2006
Total Posts : 1047
 
   Posted 7/14/2007 6:32 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
jboland said...
Considering that the Sportster gets such great fuel mileage (and Big Twins aren't that bad either), why is everyone so concerned that the enviro-nazis are going to force the MoCo to go over completely to liquid cooling? Isn't fuel efficiency the number 1 beef with the tree huggers?
Unfortunately it's the emmissions regs that will get them in the end. Liquid cooling means higher and more consistent engine temperatures, enabling higher compression ratios and leaner fuel mixtures. Along with fuel injection and computer controlled engine management, the liquid cooled bikes can much easier meet Euro4 regs than the air-cooled bikes. Can still be done, but Harley are having a few issues with some of their models now as they increase engine size and power with higher compressions, and it's going to get more difficult as time goes on.
 
Fuel mileage is not really too big an issue as most modern bikes are pretty efficient - Harley's have always been noted for their economy.
 
As an aside, my old 1967 Ford Falcon with the 200ci six, could achieve 30mpgUS! Would hate to put it through a modern emmissions test, though! It was only about 90hp and the new 220ci GM Holden V6 automatic could equal that with 145hp and absolutely annihilate it in performance!


They say you're only young once! I'm trying to make it last...

Back to Top
 

richie
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to richieAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2007
Total Posts : 1
 
   Posted 7/26/2007 1:59 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
smilewinkgrin i own a 2004 883xl.the 07,s with efi the bike does run better,but i can put up with carb farts.i had a stage1 kit and slip-on mufflers which really woke my bike up. the sportster is perfect for me .im 5'8'&150lbs. long live the sporster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to Top
 

brianfromdetroit
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to brianfromdetroitAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableClick to Add plasticcookies2000 to Your Y! Friends List.MSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2007
Total Posts : 112
 
   Posted 7/26/2007 2:07 PM (GMT -8)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
richie said...
smilewinkgrin i own a 2004 883xl.the 07,s with efi the bike does run better,but i can put up with carb farts.i had a stage1 kit and slip-on mufflers which really woke my bike up. the sportster is perfect for me .im 5'8'&150lbs. long live the sporster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When you added the stage 1 kit what were the major differences you experienced?


Harley Davidson Sportster 883 Stage 1 Vance and Hines

Back to Top
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum. Post Reply Printable Version
26 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
 
Forum Information
Currently it is Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:32 AM (GMT -8)
There are a total of 447,406 posts in 35,241 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 13 new threads and 230 reply posts. View Active Threads
Who's Online
This forum has 17572 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, hotlunch.
1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details