|
|
|
| Motorcycle Message Board - Motorcycle USA > MotorcycleUSA.com! > Talk Back > 2009 Indian Motorcycles - First Look | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  Harley1 Forum Moderator

       Date Joined Dec 2006 Total Posts : 247 | Posted 5/12/2008 4:08 PM (GMT -8) |   | | Indian Motorcycles released the first pictures of its 2009 Chief Standard prototype that it hopes to have out in time for Christmas. What do you think? Is it enough to help resurrect the iconic American motorcycle manufacturer or are they doomed to fail again? Sound off here. | | Back to Top | | |
  |  edpix Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 5/13/2008 2:11 AM (GMT -8) |   | I am very disappointed in this new Indian and the $30K + price is just over the top for a very uninspired design.
The original Indian motocycle company was successful because they were original, innovative and led the way in both engineering and styling. This 2009 Indian is just another retro wave, me too embarrassment to the real Indian legacy, They should be embarrassed by this design.
I really want the Indian brand to come back and be successful so the real question is do the current owners have deep enough pockets to survive this initial disaster and come back with some unique, cutting edge products.
By the way, $30K will buy you a perfectly restored '40s Chief that will satisfy you every day you own it and it will be appreciating every day on top of that! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Racer1 Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 735 | Posted 5/13/2008 6:06 AM (GMT -8) |   | Seriously... What on earth is different here, innovative, exciting? Indian head, deep fenders, chrome, retro look and a stupid price tag... I am sure that the fit, finish, reliability, dealer network and support will not be close to Harley's - which could be had for 2/3rd the price...
With the economy in the dumpster I am astonished that investors are so keen to throw away cash on the mistaken belief that a dead marque needs to be revived. RIP Indian, it had its day, it is a respected and valued piece of motorcycle history and I love to see the originals... Let it go... | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Racer1 Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 735 | Posted 5/13/2008 6:30 AM (GMT -8) |   | On a quasi related note... why is it that when some people try and revive these dead brands, they assume that time stood still and insist on making products that look like museum pieces from the day the marque died?
Look at the resurrection and success of the revived Triumph brand - they produced the new Bonnevilles as a nod to the past, but then made themselves a viable company by producing stellar, innovative products like the 675, the Speed Triple, the Sprint ST, etc.
Anyone think Indian has any plans to make ANYTHING other than a V twin, boring ass, antique looking cruiser?
Of course not - failure assured. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Blender Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2005 Total Posts : 76 | Posted 5/13/2008 10:31 AM (GMT -8) |   | | Well the good news is that claims of Harley Davidsons being outrageously overpriced should suddenly decrease. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Dr. Bombay Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2004 Total Posts : 1328 | Posted 5/14/2008 3:56 AM (GMT -8) |   | I did read that Indian has plans to make a whole range of bikes, including modern, sporty ones. I had my doubts but hoped good things for them.
Sadly, this is a bad sign.
They've missed the cruiser boom. It'll still be a big market in the U.S., but it'll much tighter in the coming years. Hell, even H-D is finally having trouble--and getting the message. Entering this market at this time with a $30+K me-too bike will likely end in disaster. Even three or four years ago, the cruiser market was totally oversaturated.
In its day, Indian was known as the high-performance brand. A much more potentially successful strategy would have been some kind of modern, clean-sheet design. Not necessarily a sportbike, but maybe a modern cruiser and some sort of muscle bike that would have been more in line with the original Indian philosophy and could position them in a somewhat unique niche. Of course, this would have cost a lot more money, too.
Stellican might have experience in reviving brands, but they've missed the mark here. And they haven't really paid attention to sound brand positioning and market dynamics. They tried the easy way instead of doing something that would have made a real impression. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  clasqm Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 5/14/2008 10:48 AM (GMT -8) |   | | The parallel with Triumph does not really work. True, Triumph dipped its toes in the water with the Thunderbird, but the Bonneville range only came after they had made their reputation with more modern designs. | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Racer1 Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 735 | Posted 5/14/2008 5:29 PM (GMT -8) |   | clasqm said... The parallel with Triumph does not really work. True, Triumph dipped its toes in the water with the Thunderbird, but the Bonneville range only came after they had made their reputation with more modern designs.
The comparison with Triumph is totally valid, precisely BECAUSE of the differences. Both were dead brands revived by wealthy investors and entrepreneurs. One did it properly, the other has made a major mistake that even Ray Charles could see coming.
Triumph got it right, deciding to be a cutting edge, competitive motorcycle manufacturer - they make modern, innovative, reliable, sanely priced bikes with a range of models for all ages and riding styles.
Indian has decided that time has stood still and that they should produce museum pieces that look exactly the same as the day that Indian died. They are stupidly priced, overweight relics for actors and people with more money than sense - I can see George Clooney getting his check book out already!
There is a limit to how much overpriced, poorly functioning nostalgia people will buy. Triumph realized that and wrote their business plan accordingly. This "me too" version of Indian will fail because the genuine motorcyclists will not be interested, and the market for overpriced, nostalgic toys best sold out of a Sharper Image catalogue is dwindling by the day, along with the purchasing power of the dollar... | | Back to Top | | |
  |  rdawsoniii Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 26 | Posted 5/15/2008 5:01 PM (GMT -8) |   | Wow....LOTS of negativity here.
I think this is a beautiful looking bike, especially the vintage. Some folks complain that the style is too old-fashioned and not "innovative". Personally, I think it would have been huge mistake to come out initially with something other than the "classic" Chief look. The people who will be buying the first bikes will be people who know the Indian name. They know what a Chief is supposed to look like. If you start out with some radical design change you are risking failure from the get-go. Once the brand gets up and going..THEN start with the innovations on new models. Besides, not everyone likes sleek, lean, "innovative" styles. For example, I think Victory's are ugly, along with most jap and Harley cruisers.
The Indian is not for everyone. It is not meant for the masses, and will never be mass-produced. They only plan on making 750 the first year. Will they sell that many? Probably. Even though the economy may be a bit sluggish right now, the target market for this bike is usually not affect much, if at all, by economic downturns. Obviously I'm sure they want to increase that over the years but they will never crank out 8-10,000/yr.
I suspect Stellican want to market the Indian (at least for now) to the 40+ generation with money to spend, who wants a bike that will set them apart from the Harley crowd. You can't deny that Indian motorcycles are head-turners.
I also think Stellican's strategy has been brilliant. They have identified their market and done their research. They are taking it slow and are committed to building a quality machine. They are NOT a public stock company so they are not beholden to the almighty stockholder. Does that guarantee they won't fail? No. But I'd be willing to bet they'll be around awhile.
Finally....I'm 49 years old. I started riding in 2004 when my wife bought me my '04 Suzuki Volusia. Since then I've developed a passion for Indian motorcycles. I was hoping the new bike would cost about the same as a high end Harley. Am I disappointed? Yes. But I hope one day to own a red, tan leather, Indian Chief Vintage. I'd like to retire in 6-10 years and as a retirement present to myself, I want a spankin' new Indian. It is a tall order and I'm not sure I'll be able to save enough by then. But that doesn't mean I don't think Stellican isn't going about this the right way (I think they are).
I wish them nothing but success.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Racer1 Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 735 | Posted 5/15/2008 8:16 PM (GMT -8) |   | ".... They know what a Chief is supposed to look like....."
Ahhh, no... They know what a Chief USED to look like, eons ago when Indian went bust. I am unsure what exactly the motivation is to produce reproduction museum pieces when motorcycle development has progressed 50 years since then. If Indian had continued to this day, they would have progressed and developed new models - they would not have frozen their product line - it's possible they could have been producing AMA Superbike winning race bikes - who knows? The only reason we don't think a Triumph i(or Honda, Suzuki, etc) is SUPPOSED to look like one of their models from the past is because they continued to develop and evolve.
I guess if someone wants to pay three times the price of a GSXR1000 on an overweight, piece of nostalgia that is their perogative. I am not sure that basing a business on finding that kind of customer is a smart move - although maybe P.T. Barnum was right..... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Nodian Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 18 | Posted 5/15/2008 8:27 PM (GMT -8) |   | After reading your post I can't help but think you either work for or have a freind or relative that works for Indian Motorcycle.
Give me a break! Indian is only going to make 750 units because they can't sell more than that or if even that. What is so brilliant about their strategy? They are doing the same thing the last two companies did when they resurected the Indian name and we know what happened to them...bankruptcy
And yes, I can deny the Indian is a head turner. Obviously you must be an Indian Rep. you just called most Jap bikes, Harley bikes, and Victory bikes ugly but find the Indian to be a head turner.
A $31K Indian would be a sad retirement present, considering by the time you retire they will be loooong goooone. But look on the bright side, in 2010 you can buy a new non-current Indian for maybe $10K from one of the last Indian dealers who is about to close his doors.
"Some folks complain that the style is too old-fashioned and not "innovative". Personally, I think it would have been huge mistake to come out initially with something other than the "classic" Chief look. The people who will be buying the first bikes will be people who know the Indian name".
And if "the people" who are buying this bike know the Indian name they would know Indian used innovation to set themselves apart from Harley and the rest of the competition.
P.S. rdawsoniii you have a new join date because Indain paid you to defend their image. I have a new join date because your post was so insincere that I had to call you out.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  rdawsoniii Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 26 | Posted 5/16/2008 5:03 AM (GMT -8) |   | |
I'm sorry nodian, but you are totally and completely wrong. I do not own an Indian. I live in Iowa, so obviously I have no connection with them WHATSOEVER. I have no relatives working at Indian. I don't even know anyone who owns one. I ride a 2004 Suzuki Volusia. It is the first and only bike I've ever owned.
Just because you don't agree with Stellican's strategy doesn't mean you are right, or that they will fail. They have a great track record...how many brands have YOU revived and made a profit at? I'm sure they know what they are doing. Look at the people they have on staff.
What the naysayers on this board seem to forget is: THIS IS NOT A BIKE FOR EVERYONE, NOR IS IT EVER GOING TO BE MASS PRODUCED. It is only being made for a SMALL, select, niche market. They don't need to make 10,000+ bikes to make a profit. That is why the strategy is so good. If they tried to make a bike for everyone, or mass-produce, then they probably will fail. I have no doubt that, once they add new models, you will start seeing more innovation. First things first, though.
Yes, I think Victory's and most of the metric cruisers (sorry I used the term jap...I withdraw it) are not attractive. You think different and that is fine. You say Indian bikes are not head-turners...well, I'm just going by personal observation. When I've seen an Indian parked somewhere, there are usually several people around it, looking at it. I've also seen people turn their heads and look at an Indian when it has gone by, yet ignore a Harley or whatever else drives past.
If Indian wants to pay me to be a shill, then I'd be happy to. If YOU want to call me a shill because I support the new Indian, then I guess I'm a shill. I guess I wasn't aware of the rules...meaning, if you say good things about a company or product you are automatically a "shill". As for my retirement present....who are you to say they won't still be in business then? That is your opinion. Maybe they won't be. I'm betting they will. Like I said...just because YOU (or others on this board) don't agree with their market strategy, and don't like the looks or the price, doesn't mean Indian will fail. The people at Stellican know a little bit more about this stuff than we do. I admit I'm disappointed in their pricing. I was hoping they would be about the same as Harley. I may never be able to afford one. If I can't, fine. I still want them to succeed.
Time will tell.
Oh....as for my "joined" date.....I'm sorry, but I didnt' realize you had to be on a site for a minimum period of time before posting. Next time I'll check with you first.
Post Edited (rdawsoniii) : 5/16/2008 2:17:42 PM GMT | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Nodian Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 18 | Posted 5/16/2008 9:29 AM (GMT -8) |   | |
who are you to say they won't still be in business then"?
Who are you to say they will be in business 10yrs from now?
Just because you do like their bikes does not mean they will still be in business later.
Show me one, just one bike that is for everyone.
If Jap bikes are ugly then why didn't you buy an Indian the first or second time around they were revived, either new or used?
You can find used ones with low miles and cheap.
The Indians you see people standing around looking at are probably the REAL Indians, not the want-a-be.
It is not a matter of me disagreeing with their market strategy; it's a matter of fact that their strategy is tired and old and has a proven track record of failure. The strategy, not Stellican, is stale just ask the previous business owners and now bankrupt dealers that supported Indian the last two times in the past 9 yrs. and don't forget Excelsior-Henderson.
My opinion has nothing to do with anything. My comments are based off fact and history. Your comments are based off personal opinion, which is fine, but don't confuse my facts with your heart-felt opinion. I would love to see an American company like Indian grow and be successful, but it won't happen with $31K bikes in a saturated market segment. Even Harley is having troubles. It will take more than fancy fenders (which are extra) to set this bike apart.
None, that’s how many brands I have rebuilt. How many brands have you rebuilt? Seeing as how that is your criteria of whether or not you can have a discussion about this topic, then if you haven’t revived any brands either I guess your point is rather childish and quite hypocritical.
How much do you want to bet they will be around in say...5 yrs. from now?
| | Back to Top | | |
    |  rdawsoniii Registered Member
        Date Joined May 2008 Total Posts : 26 | Posted 5/16/2008 2:26 PM (GMT -8) |   | | Well nodian, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
I can't guarantee Indian will be around 10 years from now any more than you can say they won't be. I've been following this story with interest since Stellican bought the name. I was skeptical at first, but the more I read about Mr. Julius and his plan/vision for Indian the more impressed I am. This man is going at it ssssslllllooooowww, with quality being the #1 priority (the innovation will come later). He is looking 15-20 years down the road, not just the here and now. If you think the folks at Stellican don't know what is going on in the motorcycle market, then you are a fool (and I DON'T think you are a fool!!). I would encourage you to read past interviews from Mr. Julius.
Julius and Stellican have a proven track record....and THAT is a FACT. I think they know just a LITTLE bit more about this kind of thing than you, I, or anyone else on this board. For ANYONE to pronounce (or predict) the new Indian a failure at this point is patently absurd.
Like I said....time will tell. I believe Indian will be around awhile this time. On the other hand, if the bike they put out is of no better quality than the Gilroy.....then they are dead in the water. Julius knows this. That is why they are taking their time. If they don't put out a high quality machine from the get-go, this revival will be over before it even gets started.
I'd like to clear up a couple of misconceptions in your last reply.
1. I've never seen a Springfield Indian. Seriously! The only ones I've ever seen are the Gilroy's. They seem to gather a crowd. Heck, my Suzuki looks like an Indian with the Indian head fender light and headdress tank decal and I have people constantly giving me "nice bike" comments (I am always sure to tell people it is NOT an Indian). But...this is just anecdotal based on what *I've* seen.
2. Why didn't I buy a Gilroy Indian? I've never purchased a motorcycle in my life. The one and only bike I've ever had (have) is the 2004 Suzuki Volusia my wife bought me that year for Father's Day. At that time I had barely even heard of Indian...didn't even know if they were still being made. I googled it and found their website, then learned shortly after that they went out of business. I want to buy a new Indian, not an old used one. I want an Indian with an active dealer network for service work (I am not mechanically inclined). If the new Indian goes under, then I'll never own an Indian motorcycle.
I happen to have developed a passion for Indians. I hope the new company survives and I hope to own one someday. If not, then life goes on. In the meantime, we should welcome the return of the Indian and hope for the best.....and not try to pass judgement until we see what happens. Fair enough? Post Edited (rdawsoniii) : 5/16/2008 10:30:12 PM GMT | | Back to Top | | |
 | 58 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Sunday, November 22, 2009 1:00 AM (GMT -8) There are a total of 447,406 posts in 35,241 threads. In the last 3 days there were 13 new threads and 230 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 17572 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, hotlunch. 1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2 dotNetBB © 2000-2009 All content found on motorcycle-usa.com is copyrighted by MotorcycleUSA.com, INC. |
|
|